dc.contributor.author | Hannigan, Cathy | |
dc.contributor.other | McClay, Deirdre | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-26T16:07:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-26T16:07:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Harvard University of Limerick | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | Masters of Arts in Learning and Teaching (Taught) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/2179 | |
dc.description.abstract | This action research took place over ten weeks of laboratory practical work within a Food
Microbiology module at Letterkenny Institute of Technology (LYIT). The customary method
of assessing laboratory practical work is to mark the student’s laboratory report after each
laboratory practical without a transparent marking scheme. The purpose of this research is to
investigate if the implementation of a criteria based marking scheme, in the form of a rubric,
together with student self-assessment and lecturer feedback, is an effective teaching tool for
the enhancement of student learning in the practical element of a Level 7, Food Science degree
module.
A mixed methods approach was used in this research. Literature themes researched included,
rubric-assessment, self-assessment, feedback and assessing laboratory practicals. Data
collection methods used included student rubric-based self-assessment sheets, assessment
feedback sheets from the lecturer, fourteen questionnaires and three semi structured interviews.
Student self-assessment marks were compared with those from the lecturer to plot changes over
time. The findings suggest that by repeated use of the rubric, students’ judgements of their
marks do converge with the lecturer’s marks. However, the overestimating of marks by
students with respect to their achieved laboratory practical marks is remarkable. A significant
correlation was found between continuous use of the self-assessment rubric and the marks
achieved for their laboratory practical write-up. In future, these findings may be enhanced by
supporting the student more rigorously during the self-assessment process with examplars and
training in the use of rubrics, self-assessment and feedback. In addition, self-assessment
rubrics supported with written lecturer feedback should be considered as an assessment strategy
for laboratory based subjects by LYIT. | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ | * |
dc.subject | Humanities | en_US |
dc.subject | student rubric-based self-assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | written feedback | en_US |
dc.subject | enhancement of student learning | en_US |
dc.title | ‘An investigation into the use of rubric-based self-assessment and written feedback as an effective teaching tool for the enhancement of student learning in the practical element of a food science degree module’. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | Letterkenny Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.rights.access | Creative Commons | en_US |
dc.subject.department | Science | en_US |