Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClarke, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorSharp, Linda
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Aoife
dc.contributor.authorKearney, Patricia M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T10:03:41Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T10:03:41Z
dc.date.copyright2014-11-06
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationClarke, N., Sharp, L., Osborne, A., & Kearney, P. M. (2015). Comparison of uptake of colorectal cancer screening based on fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in males and females: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 24(1), 39-47. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-14-0774en_US
dc.identifier.issn1538-7755
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/2342
dc.description.abstractBackground: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in males and the second in females worldwide. Incidence and mortality are higher in men than women. Colorectal cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality. Internationally, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is increasingly being recommended as the primary screening test. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether uptake of FIT screening differs between men than women. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for peer-reviewed articles published in English during 2000–2013 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies of screening using FIT that quantified numbers invited and participating by gender. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Results: Six hundred and eighty-five citations were identified, 19 meeting the inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analysis found male uptake was significantly lower than female uptake [odds ratio (OR), 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75–0.95; P < 0.01]. This generally persisted throughout subgroup analysis of study design (RCTs vs. observational studies and study quality), screening organization (methods of invitation, number of samples, age range of screening, recommendations, and reminders), and setting. Conclusions: Meta analysis of FIT screening studies indicates significantly lower uptake among men. Impact: Further investigation is required into factors influencing acceptability and participation of FIT screening in both sexes.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Cancer Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Preventionen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/*
dc.titleComparison of uptake of colorectal cancer screening based on fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in males and females: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.grantnoCRS11CLAen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorN. Clarke was funded through a PhD research scholarship from the Irish Cancer Society (Grant code: CRS11CLA).en_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0774en_US
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject.departmenthealthCORE - IT Carlowen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland