dc.contributor.author | Doyle, Andrew | |
dc.contributor.author | Gumaelius, Lena B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pears, Arnold Neville | |
dc.contributor.author | Seery, Niall | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-14T07:59:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-14T07:59:05Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Doyle, A., & Gumaelius, L. B., & Pears, A. N., & Seery, N. (2019, June), Theorizing the Role of Engineering Education for Society: Technological Activity in Context? Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/33436 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | Articles - Other - AIT | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3090 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper establishes a theoretical position from which to analyse and reason about the
difficulties associated with closing the gap between the provision of engineering education in
universities and the needs of society. Broadly speaking, the disparity between societal
expectations and university graduate profiles highlights that despite achieving success in
university; recently graduated engineers are often under-prepared for their initial years in the
workplace. Continuing reports of this disparity suggest that current efforts have not succeeded in
sufficiently closing this gap.
As an antecedent to reforming engineering education policy or advocating a new pedagogical
approach, we first theorise the role of engineering education for society. In adopting lessons from
the philosophy of technology and how this has influenced the discourse surrounding K-12
technology education, the relationship between technological activity and technological
knowledge is considered as a vessel though which to articulate engineering education. Through
situating engineering disciplines as different contexts for technology, the need for engineering
students to develop an ontological position towards engineering as technological activity, emerges
as important.
In this view, we hold that a fluid epistemological boundary for engineering disciplines
necessitates perspectives on how to enact engineering, as doing engineering in authentic contexts
is advocated to support the well-established practices around learning about discipline specific
declarative knowledge. The foregrounding of an understanding of engineering as technological
activity, founded on (but not limited to) well-established discipline specific knowledge is framed
as an ‘ontology-based curriculum’.
We conclude the paper with a discussion of some of the prevailing challenges to operationalising
this conception of engineering education for society | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ASEE | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ | * |
dc.subject | Engineering education | en_US |
dc.subject | Technology education | en_US |
dc.subject | Technological activity | en_US |
dc.subject | Engineering education policy | en_US |
dc.title | Theorizing the role of engineering for society: technological activity in context? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.peerreview | yes | en_US |
dc.identifier.conference | 2019 ASEE Annual Conference. June 16-19, 2019. Tampa Convention Centre, Tampa, Florida. | |
dc.identifier.orcid | orcid.org/0000-0003-419 | |
dc.rights.access | Open Access | en_US |
dc.subject.department | Academic Affairs & Registry - AIT | en_US |