dc.contributor.author | Shah, Rizwan | |
dc.contributor.author | Ashgar, Mamoona Naveed | |
dc.contributor.author | Abdullah, Saima | |
dc.contributor.author | Fleury, Martin | |
dc.contributor.author | Gohar, Neelam | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-21T07:48:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-21T07:48:15Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Shah, R., Asghar, M.N., Abdullah, S., Fleury, M., Gohar, N. (2019). Effectiveness of crypto-transcoding for H.264/AVC and HEVC video bit-streams. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 78, 21455–21484. doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7451-5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1380-7501 | |
dc.identifier.other | Articles - Software Research Institute AIT | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3222 | |
dc.description.abstract | To avoid delays arising from a need to decrypt a video prior to transcoding and then re-encrypt it afterwards, this paper
assesses a selective encryption (SE) content protection scheme. The scheme is suited to both recent standardized codecs, namely
H.264/Advanced Video Coding (AVC) and High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). Specifically, the paper outlines a joint cryptotranscoding
scheme for secure transrating of a video bitstream. That is to say it generates new video bitrates, possibly as part of an
HTTP Adaptive Streaming (HAS) content delivery network. The scheme will reduce the bitrate to one or more lower desired bitrate
without consuming time in the encryption/decryption process, which would be the case when full encryption is used. In
addition, the decryption key no longer needs to be exposed at intermediate middleboxes, including when transrating is performed
in a cloud datacenter. The effectiveness of the scheme is variously evaluated: by examination of the SE generated visual distortion;
by the extent of computational and bitrate overheads; and by choice of cipher when encrypting the selected elements within the
bitstream. Results indicate that there remains: a content; quantization level (after transrating of an encrypted video); and codectype
dependency to any distortion introduced. A further recommendation is that the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is
preferred for SE to lightweight XOR encryption, despite it being taken up elsewhere as a real-time encryption method | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Multimedia Tools and Applications | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ | * |
dc.subject | Content production | en_US |
dc.subject | H.264/AVC | en_US |
dc.subject | HEVC | en_US |
dc.subject | Selective encyrption | en_US |
dc.subject | Transcoding | en_US |
dc.subject | Transrating | en_US |
dc.subject | Video streaming | en_US |
dc.title | Effectiveness of crypto-transcoding for H.264/AVC and HEVC video bit-streams. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.peerreview | yes | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31519.00160 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7460-266X | |
dc.rights.access | Open Access | en_US |
dc.subject.department | Software Research Institute AIT | en_US |