Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHilborn, Ray
dc.contributor.authorHively, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorBaker Loke, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorde Moor, Carryn L.
dc.contributor.authorKurota, Hiroyuki
dc.contributor.authorKathena, Johannes N.
dc.contributor.authorMace, Pamela M.
dc.contributor.authorMinto, Cóilín
dc.contributor.authorParma, Ana M.
dc.contributor.authorQuiroz, Juan-Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMelnychuk, Michael C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T10:52:35Z
dc.date.available2021-05-11T10:52:35Z
dc.date.copyright2021
dc.date.issued2021-05-04
dc.identifier.citationHilborn R, Hively DJ, Loke NB, et al. Global status of groundfish stocks. Fish Fish. 2021;00:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12560en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3576
dc.description.abstractWe review the status of groundfish stocks using published scientific assessments for 349 individual stocks constituting 90% of global groundfish catch. Overall, average stock abundance is increasing and is currently above the level that would produce maximum sustainable yield (MSY). Fishing pressure for cod-like fishes (Gadiformes) and flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes) was, for several decades, on average well above levels associated with MSY, but is now at or below the level expected to produce MSY. In contrast, fishing pressure for rockfishes (Scorpaeniformes) decreased from near MSY-related levels in the mid-1990s, and since the mid-2000s has remained on average at only one third of MSY-related levels. Regions with the most depressed groundfish stocks are the Northwest Atlantic and the Pacific coast of South America, while stocks from the Northeast and Eastern Central Pacific, Northeast Atlantic, Southeast Atlantic and Southwest Pacific tend to have greatest average abundance relative to MSY-based reference points. In the most recent year available for each stock, the catch was only 61% of MSY. Equilibrium yield curves indicate that 76% of global potential groundfish yield could be achieved using current estimates of fishing pressure. 15% of this is lost by excess fishing pressure, 67% results from lower than optimal fishing pressure on healthy stocks and 18% is lost from stocks currently overfished but rebuilding. Thus, there is modest opportunity to increase catch of global groundfish fisheries by reducing overfishing on some stocks, but more by increasing harvest on others. However, there may be other reasons not to fully exploit these stocks.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFish and Fisheriesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectabundanceen_US
dc.subjectcoden_US
dc.subjectfisheries managementen_US
dc.subjectoverfishingen_US
dc.subjectpollocken_US
dc.subjectsustainable fishingen_US
dc.titleGlobal status of groundfish stocksen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationMarine Resource Assessment and Management (MARAM) Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationFisheries Resources Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, Nagasaki, Japanen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationNational Marine Information and Research Centre (NatMIRC), Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR), Swakopmund, Namibiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationFisheries New Zealand, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationMarine and Freshwater Research Centre, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, Galway, Irelanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationCentro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Chubut, Argentinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Evaluación de Recursos, Instituto de Fomento Pesquero (IFOP), Valparaíso, Chileen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Grant/Award Number: 1041570 and 1041678; David and Lucile Packard Foundation; Walton Family Foundation; Nature Conservancy; commercial fishing companies and trade associations; The Wildlife Conservation Society; National Science Foundationen_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/faf.12560en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2326-2305en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject.departmentMarine and Freshwater Research Centreen_US
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International