Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHayes, Gráinne
dc.contributor.authorDowd, Kieran P.
dc.contributor.authorMacDonncha, Ciaran
dc.contributor.authorDonnely, Alan
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T13:34:05Z
dc.date.available2021-12-20T13:34:05Z
dc.date.copyright2021
dc.date.issued2021-11-16
dc.identifier.citationHayes, G., Dowd, K., MacDonncha, C., Donnely, A. (2021). Simultaneous validation of count-to-activity thresholds for five commonly used activity monitors in adolescent research: a step towards data harmonizationen_US
dc.identifier.issn2575-6605
dc.identifier.urihttp://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3871
dc.description.abstractBackground: Multiple activity monitors are utilized for the estimation of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity in youth. Due to differing methodological approaches, results are not comparable when developing thresholds for the determination of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity. This study aimed to develop and validate count-to-activity thresholds for 1.5, 3, and 6 metabolic equivalents of task in five of the most commonly used activity monitors in adolescent research. Methods: Fifty-two participants (mean age = 16.1 [0.78] years) selected and performed activities of daily living while wearing a COSMED K4b2 and five activity monitors; ActiGraph GT1M, ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, activPAL3 micro, activPAL, and GENEActiv. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was used to examine the area under the curve and to define count-to-activity thresholds for the vertical axis (all monitors) and the sum of the vector magnitude (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT and activPAL3 micro) for 15 s (all monitors) and 60 s (ActiGraph monitors) epochs. Results: All developed count-to-activity thresholds demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity. When cross-validated in an independent group (N = 20), high levels of sensitivity and specificity generally remained (≥73.1%, intensity and monitor dependent). Conclusions: This study provides researchers with the opportunity to analyze and cross-compare data from different studies that have not employed the same motion sensors.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviouren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAccelerometeren_US
dc.subjectCount-to-activity thresholdsen_US
dc.subjectMETsen_US
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_US
dc.subjectValidationen_US
dc.subjectAdolescentsen_US
dc.titleSimultaneous validation of count-to-activity thresholds for five commonly used activity monitors in adolescent research: a step towards data harmonizationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationAthlone Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2021-0023en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2575-6613
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-1841-1604en_US
dc.subject.departmentFaculty of Science and Health AITen_US
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International