dc.contributor.author | Hayes, Gráinne | |
dc.contributor.author | Dowd, Kieran P. | |
dc.contributor.author | MacDonncha, Ciaran | |
dc.contributor.author | Donnely, Alan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-20T13:34:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-20T13:34:05Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2021 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hayes, G., Dowd, K., MacDonncha, C., Donnely, A. (2021). Simultaneous validation of count-to-activity thresholds for five commonly used activity monitors in adolescent research: a step towards data harmonization | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2575-6605 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3871 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Multiple activity monitors are utilized for the estimation of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity in youth. Due to differing methodological approaches, results are not comparable when developing thresholds for the determination of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity. This study aimed to develop and validate count-to-activity thresholds for 1.5, 3, and 6 metabolic equivalents of task in five of the most commonly used activity monitors in adolescent research. Methods: Fifty-two participants (mean age = 16.1 [0.78] years) selected and performed activities of daily living while wearing a COSMED K4b2 and five activity monitors; ActiGraph GT1M, ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, activPAL3 micro, activPAL, and GENEActiv. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was used to examine the area under the curve and to define count-to-activity thresholds for the vertical axis (all monitors) and the sum of the vector magnitude (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT and activPAL3 micro) for 15 s (all monitors) and 60 s (ActiGraph monitors) epochs. Results: All developed count-to-activity thresholds demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity. When cross-validated in an independent group (N = 20), high levels of sensitivity and specificity generally remained (≥73.1%, intensity and monitor dependent). Conclusions: This study provides researchers with the opportunity to analyze and cross-compare data from different studies that have not employed the same motion sensors. | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Human Kinetics | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Accelerometer | en_US |
dc.subject | Count-to-activity thresholds | en_US |
dc.subject | METs | en_US |
dc.subject | Physical activity | en_US |
dc.subject | Validation | en_US |
dc.subject | Adolescents | en_US |
dc.title | Simultaneous validation of count-to-activity thresholds for five commonly used activity monitors in adolescent research: a step towards data harmonization | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Athlone Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.description.peerreview | yes | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2021-0023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2575-6613 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-1841-1604 | en_US |
dc.subject.department | Faculty of Science and Health AIT | en_US |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | en_US |