dc.contributor.author | Hynes, Eoghan | |
dc.contributor.author | Flynn, Ronan | |
dc.contributor.author | Murray, Niall | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Brian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-09T13:19:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-09T13:19:20Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2022 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hynes, E., E., Flynn, R., Murray, N., Lee, B. (2022). A quality of experience evaluation of example versus procedural instruction formats for augmented reality based procedure training. Presented at TUS MMW Poster Presentation Seminar January 2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3892 | |
dc.description.abstract | Augmented reality (AR) is a technology that can enhance the user’s world view with computer
generated information.
This information can take the form of the domain-specific instructions required for successful
completion of novel procedures.
A procedure is a suite of steps that must be followed in strict order for successful completion. A
novel procedure is one that is new to the user.
Instruction format is a consideration concerning efficient use of limited power and computation
resources on mobile AR devices.
Procedural instructions describe how to complete tasks in a stepwise manner and examples
demonstrate how instances of the task are carried out.
Crucial to user acceptability of AR for the procedure assistance role is high quality of
experience (QoE). QoE is concerned with the degree of fulfilment of the user’s pragmatic and
hedonic needs and expectations which will be influenced by instruction format.
This is measured in terms of the user’s degree of delight or annoyance i.e., emotional response
to stimuli, manifesting as changes in physiology and thought patterns which are measurable
using sensors and questionnaires. Although the individual human experience is subjective, it is
underpinned by this common physiological mechanism. However, it is influenced by
personality, context, technical, social and psychological factors. | en_US |
dc.publisher | TUS Midlands Midwest | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | QoE experience evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | Augmented reality | en_US |
dc.subject | Procedure training | en_US |
dc.title | A quality of experience evaluation of example versus procedural instruction formats for augmented reality based procedure training | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/other | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Athlone Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Science Foundation Ireland | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-0638-547X | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-6475-005X | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-5919-0596 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-8475-4074 | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject.department | Faculty of Engineering and Informatics AIT | en_US |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.relation.projectid | SFI/16/RC/3918 | en_US |