Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhite, P.J.
dc.contributor.authorDeevy, Colin
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Brian
dc.contributor.authorPatocs, Audrey
dc.contributor.authorRaina, Parminder
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T15:13:16Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T15:13:16Z
dc.date.copyright2023
dc.date.issued2023-10-09
dc.identifier.citationWhite, P., Deevy, C., Casey, B., Patocs, A.,and Raina, P.(2023) Co-design for interdisciplinary research communities, in De Sainz Molestina, D., Galluzzo, L., Rizzo, F., Spallazzo, D. (Eds.), Life-Changing Design: 10th Conference on International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR). https://doi.org/10.21606/iasdr.2023.226en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/4836
dc.description.abstractComplex research challenges facing society today require an integrative approach, therefore, interdisciplinary research is now required more often. By creating interdisciplinary research communities, we facilitate communication, collaboration, and knowledge sharing between researchers from different fields. It can however be difficult to create interdisciplinary communities within universities, but co-design methods have been seen as being beneficial in doing so. Reporting and reflecting on three case studies (including N=130 participants), this paper aims to explore the use of co-design methods in creating interdisciplinary research communities In this paper, we focus on two main characteristics of co-design workshops. 1. Design/ Scheduling and Planning and 2. Workshop Formats, specifically co-design canvases. In doing so it seeks to 1. Offer a report and reflection on the three different co-design workshop approaches informing future co-design research and practice. 2. Understand how different formats of co-design help enhance interdisciplinary research communities in universities. It found that there were trade-offs in selecting approaches. Structured co-design approaches offer clear expectations and organisation but may limit creativity, while semi-structured approaches provide flexibility but may lead to reduced focus. Similar trade-offs were seen in the differing fidelities of canvas design. Low-fidelity canvases are inclusive but may lack detail, while high-fidelity canvases may limit creativity. Medium-fidelity canvases strike a balance between visual appeal and detail. It was found the best approach depends on the specific context and goals of participants; therefore, it is important to prepare in advance to tailor workshops to the needs and preferences of the participants involved.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Association of Societies of Design Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIASDR Conference 2023en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCo-Designen_US
dc.subjectResearch Communityen_US
dc.subjectUniversityen_US
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary Researchen_US
dc.titleCo-design for interdisciplinary research communitiesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.conference.date2023-10-09
dc.conference.hostInternational Association of Societies of Design Researchen_US
dc.conference.locationMilan, Italyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDesignCORE, Humanities, South East Technological University, Kilkenny Road, Carlow, Irelanden_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21606/iasdr.2023.226en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5716-8643en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://dl.designresearchsociety.org/iasdr/iasdr2023/fullpapers/53/en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject.departmentdesignCOREen_US
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States