Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorSeery, Niall
dc.contributor.authorGumaelius, Lena
dc.contributor.authorCanty, Donal
dc.contributor.authorHartell, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-29T14:47:58Z
dc.date.available2020-02-29T14:47:58Z
dc.date.copyright2018-05
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationDoyle, A., Seery, N., Gumaelius, L, Canty, D. (2019). Reconceptualising PCK research in D&T education: proposing a methodological framework to investigate enacted practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 29: 373-491. doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9456-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn0957-7572
dc.identifier.issn1573-1804
dc.identifier.otherTechnology Education Research Group - Articlesen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3020
dc.description.abstractSince first conceived, the concept of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has attracted much attention. Despite being lauded by educationalists as the unique knowledge base of teachers, research on the concept over the past 30 years has yet to result in a universally accepted definition being presented. Much of the contentions surrounding the lack of an agreed upon conception appear to have stemmed from difficulties in understanding the relationship between PCK, other areas of teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, and enacted practice. This paper considers the application of PCK frameworks to design and technology (D&T) education, through an analysis of the nature of the discipline from an ontological and epistemological perspective and contemporary perspectives on the construct of PCK. It is theorised that the volition afforded to teachers in D&T through weakly framed subject boundaries negates the effective application of PCK frameworks, as teachers’ beliefs have a greater impact on enacted practices. In an attempt to better understanding enacted practice in D&T education, the paper proposes a methodological framework centred on the interactions between teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the discipline, through synthesising the concept of amplifiers and filters of practice with the nature of D&T education. The proposed framework outlines the need to recognise individual teachers’ conception of capability as a critical influence on enacted practice.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Technology and Design Educationen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/*
dc.subjectEnacted practiceen_US
dc.subjectDesign and technology educationen_US
dc.subjectAmplifiers and filters of practiceen_US
dc.subjectPedagogical content knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectConception of capabilityen_US
dc.titleReconceptualising PCK research in D&T education: proposing a methodological framework to investigate enacted practice.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9456-1
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199-4753
dc.rights.accessOpen Accessen_US
dc.subject.departmentTERGen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland