Framing the constructive alignment of design within technology subjects in general education.
Date
2020-05-27Author
Buckley, Jeffrey
Seery, Niall
Gumaelius, Lena
Canty, Donal
Doyle, Andrew
Pears, Arnold
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Design is core element of general technology education internationally. While there is
a degree of contention with regards to its treatment, there is general consensus that the
inclusion of design in some form is important, if not characteristic, of the subject area.
Acknowledging that design is important, there are many questions which need to be considered
in order to guide policy and practice, such as whether a singular general design
ability can be explicitly defined empirically beyond an implicit verbal definition, and
whether it can be taught and assessed. In order to address these questions in a systematic
fashion, a framework is needed in order to guide relevant investigations. Having such a
framework would allow for theory to be generated, hypotheses to be tested, and assumptions
to be challenged. In response to this apparent need, this article presents a theoretical
discussion pertaining to the constructive alignment of learning to design, wherein theories
of knowledge, variation theory, knowledge transfer, and assessment validity and reliability
are reflected upon.
The following license files are associated with this item: