dc.contributor.author | Vijayakumar, Sowmya | |
dc.contributor.author | Flynn, Ronan | |
dc.contributor.author | Murray, Niall | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-23T12:19:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-23T12:19:35Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vijayakumar, S., Flynn, R., Murray, N. (2020). A comparative study of machine learning techniques for emotion recognition from peripheral physiological signals. In ISSC 2020. 31st Irish Signals and Systems Conference. 11th-12th June. Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland. doi: 10.1109/ISSC49989.2020.9180193 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781728194189 | |
dc.identifier.other | Conferences - Electronics, Computer & Software Engineering - AIT | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3314 | |
dc.description.abstract | Recent developments in wearable technology
have led to increased research interest in using peripheral
physiological signals for emotion recognition. The non-invasive
nature of peripheral physiological signal measurement via
wearables enables ecologically valid long-term monitoring.
These peripheral signal measurements can be used in real-time
in many ways including health and emotion classification. This
paper investigates the utility of peripheral physiological signals
for emotion recognition using the publicly available DEAP
database. Using this database (which contains
electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and peripheral signals),
this paper compares eight machine learning models in the
classification of valence and arousal emotion dimensions. These
were applied to the peripheral physiological signals only. These
models operate on three groupings of the peripheral data: (i) the
raw peripheral physiological signals; (ii) individual feature sets
extracted from each peripheral signal; and (iii) a fusion data set
made of the combined features from the individual peripheral
signals. The results indicate that support vector machine, linear
discriminant analysis and logistic regression give the best
recognition results on all three data groups considered. The
feature fusion data set, which is made up by fusing all the
features from the peripheral signals, gives the best recognition
accuracy on both valence and arousal dimensions. In addition,
subject dependency for emotion classification from peripheral
signals is examined and significant individual variability is
observed. The recognition rate varies between each participant
from 10% to 87.5%. | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | IEEE | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | ISSC 2020. 31st Irish Signals and System Conference. | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ | * |
dc.subject | Peripheral | en_US |
dc.subject | Physiological signals | en_US |
dc.subject | Emotion recognition | en_US |
dc.subject | Machine learning | en_US |
dc.subject | Wearables | en_US |
dc.subject | Classification | en_US |
dc.title | A comparative study of machine learning techniques for emotion recognition from peripheral physiological signals. | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Athlone Institute of Technology President’s Doctoral Scholarship 2019 | en_US |
dc.description.peerreview | yes | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | doi: 10.1109/ISSC49989.2020.9180193 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-8342 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-005X | |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-0596 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | doi: 10.1109/ISSC49989.2020.9180193 | |
dc.rights.access | Open Access | en_US |
dc.subject.department | Faculty of Engineering & Informatics AIT | en_US |