Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVijayakumar, Sowmya
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Ronan
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Niall
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T12:19:35Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T12:19:35Z
dc.date.copyright2020
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.citationVijayakumar, S., Flynn, R., Murray, N. (2020). A comparative study of machine learning techniques for emotion recognition from peripheral physiological signals. In ISSC 2020. 31st Irish Signals and Systems Conference. 11th-12th June. Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland. doi: 10.1109/ISSC49989.2020.9180193en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781728194189
dc.identifier.otherConferences - Electronics, Computer & Software Engineering - AITen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3314
dc.description.abstractRecent developments in wearable technology have led to increased research interest in using peripheral physiological signals for emotion recognition. The non-invasive nature of peripheral physiological signal measurement via wearables enables ecologically valid long-term monitoring. These peripheral signal measurements can be used in real-time in many ways including health and emotion classification. This paper investigates the utility of peripheral physiological signals for emotion recognition using the publicly available DEAP database. Using this database (which contains electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and peripheral signals), this paper compares eight machine learning models in the classification of valence and arousal emotion dimensions. These were applied to the peripheral physiological signals only. These models operate on three groupings of the peripheral data: (i) the raw peripheral physiological signals; (ii) individual feature sets extracted from each peripheral signal; and (iii) a fusion data set made of the combined features from the individual peripheral signals. The results indicate that support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis and logistic regression give the best recognition results on all three data groups considered. The feature fusion data set, which is made up by fusing all the features from the peripheral signals, gives the best recognition accuracy on both valence and arousal dimensions. In addition, subject dependency for emotion classification from peripheral signals is examined and significant individual variability is observed. The recognition rate varies between each participant from 10% to 87.5%.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofISSC 2020. 31st Irish Signals and System Conference.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/*
dc.subjectPeripheralen_US
dc.subjectPhysiological signalsen_US
dc.subjectEmotion recognitionen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectWearablesen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of machine learning techniques for emotion recognition from peripheral physiological signals.en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.contributor.sponsorAthlone Institute of Technology President’s Doctoral Scholarship 2019en_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi: 10.1109/ISSC49989.2020.9180193
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-8342
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-005X
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-0596
dc.identifier.orciddoi: 10.1109/ISSC49989.2020.9180193
dc.rights.accessOpen Accessen_US
dc.subject.departmentFaculty of Engineering & Informatics AITen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland